Market Comment
Negative sentiment continued to rule Ukrainian stock exchanges Tuesday (July 20). The UX exchange closed down 0.37% on very low activity – total trading volume was a meager UAH 38.6 mln. The UX showed positive dynamics after the opening bell, but soon reversed gains as support from buyers fizzled. Among blue chips, only Ukrtelecom (UTLM +1.55%) and Zakhidenergo (ZAEN +0.19%) managed to stay on top. Metals and mining stocks underperformed the market: ALMK -0.8%, AVDK -1.35%, AZST -1.58%, ENMZ -1.54%, YASK -1.26%. Banks slipped (BAVL -0.11%, USCB -1%) followed by Motor Sich (MSICH -0.58%) and Ukrnafta (UNAF -0.49%).
Ukrainian stocks on international markets closed mostly higher. Regal Petroleum (+10.23%) posted a double-digit gain paring the previous days’ losses. Other names listed on the London Stock Exchange also traded in positive territory: JKX Oil & Gas (JKX LN) inched up 0.07%, Ferrexpo (FXPO LN) advanced 2.11%, MHP (MHPC LI) added 0.07%. Large trading volumes were observed for Kernel (KER PW), but the stock came under selling pressure and lost 2.87%.
Trading activity for Ukrainian Eurobonds was higher than average yesterday. Investors had their sights set on sovereign issues, which traded down during the first half of the session but reversed later on to close flat. First tier corporates MHP, DTEK and METINV traded up, adding at least a quarter point on the day.
Macro: Ukraine to receive $3 bln from the IMF in 2010
Fixed Income: Metinvest receives syndicated loan
Oil & Gas: Ukrnafta August oil supplies priced at $60/bbl
Food processing: Astarta opens a new elevator
Agriculture: Landkom reports 1H2010 results
People Following Jon's Blog
My Latest Tweet @ Twitter.com
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Daily Market Brief
Labels: Alternative Investments
jon m queen,
jon mckee queen,
jon queen,
ukraine investment,
ukraine market
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Bulgaria Temorarily Banned From Carbon Trading
Greetings folks, recently there's been a bunch of rumblings about Bulgaria possibly getting suspended from carbon trading. Well, it is now confirmed. They're suspended for an indefinite period.
According to a recent Reuters news article below (available at http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65S3RU20100629), the official announcement happened yesterday.
Bulgaria had been under fire for faulty greenhouse gas accounting and reporting according to United Nations and EU standards. Basically, the figures used by the Bulgarian government have been considered less than credible -- thereby undermining the validity of their carbon trading activity. So they are being suspended until such time that they clean up their act.
Given the large amount of money Bulgaria stands to lose if they don't get into compliance during the coming months, it is highly probable that they will fix the problems before the end of this year. But only time will tell -- until then we will just have to wait and see.
Sofia has been expecting the move since the middle of May, when the Bonn-based U.N. Climate Change Secretariat that oversees compliance of U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol warned the Balkan country its accreditation will be revoked.
The ministry said it has already taken measures to improve emission registering and expects a visit by U.N. experts in September and October to allow the Balkan country restore its accreditation before the end of the year.
The suspension will exclude Bulgarian companies from trading in greenhouse gas trading schemes under Kyoto, and would also affect their participation in the European Union's emissions trading scheme.
Industrial producers and utilities can carry out deals in the EU's carbon scheme, but the actual transfer of allowances to and from the national register would not be possible and would hamper spot trading.
Spot EU permit trading and Bulgaria's share of permits both account for a small portion to the total EU carbon market.
The suspension also means Bulgaria cannot sell the surplus sovereign emissions rights it has accumulated under Kyoto. The recession-hit country had hoped to sell at least 40 million metric tons of its Assigned Amount Units this year, worth upwards of 400 million euros ($488.2 million).
Greece received a similar suspension for seven months in 2008, but Greek companies were able to continue trading in the EU market as it was not yet linked to the Kyoto schemes.
(Reporting by Tsvetelia Tsolova)
According to a recent Reuters news article below (available at http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65S3RU20100629), the official announcement happened yesterday.
Bulgaria had been under fire for faulty greenhouse gas accounting and reporting according to United Nations and EU standards. Basically, the figures used by the Bulgarian government have been considered less than credible -- thereby undermining the validity of their carbon trading activity. So they are being suspended until such time that they clean up their act.
Given the large amount of money Bulgaria stands to lose if they don't get into compliance during the coming months, it is highly probable that they will fix the problems before the end of this year. But only time will tell -- until then we will just have to wait and see.
Bulgaria suspended from U.N. Kyoto carbon trade
Tue, Jun 29 2010
SOFIA (Reuters) - Bulgaria has been suspended from United Nations carbon trading for violating greenhouse reporting rules set under the Kyoto Protocol, a key tool to fight climate change, the Bulgarian environment ministry said on Tuesday.Sofia has been expecting the move since the middle of May, when the Bonn-based U.N. Climate Change Secretariat that oversees compliance of U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol warned the Balkan country its accreditation will be revoked.
The ministry said it has already taken measures to improve emission registering and expects a visit by U.N. experts in September and October to allow the Balkan country restore its accreditation before the end of the year.
The suspension will exclude Bulgarian companies from trading in greenhouse gas trading schemes under Kyoto, and would also affect their participation in the European Union's emissions trading scheme.
Industrial producers and utilities can carry out deals in the EU's carbon scheme, but the actual transfer of allowances to and from the national register would not be possible and would hamper spot trading.
Spot EU permit trading and Bulgaria's share of permits both account for a small portion to the total EU carbon market.
The suspension also means Bulgaria cannot sell the surplus sovereign emissions rights it has accumulated under Kyoto. The recession-hit country had hoped to sell at least 40 million metric tons of its Assigned Amount Units this year, worth upwards of 400 million euros ($488.2 million).
Greece received a similar suspension for seven months in 2008, but Greek companies were able to continue trading in the EU market as it was not yet linked to the Kyoto schemes.
(Reporting by Tsvetelia Tsolova)
Labels: Alternative Investments
AAUs,
assigned amount units,
bulgaria,
bulgaria suspended carbon,
carbon credits,
carbon market,
jon m queen,
jon mckee queen,
jon queen,
kyoto protocol
Friday, March 26, 2010
U.S. Senators Putting Final Preparations On Cap And Trade Climate Change Law
Many people both inside and outside America have long wondered when the United States will finally pass a comprehensive federal climate change law, one that includes cap and trade. As one of the world's largest carbon emitting economies, the ultimate direction that America takes will have a significant impact on the carbon markets, green business and the environment as a whole.
Until recently, the climate subject has been relegated to secondary importance compared to the health care subject that has ensnared Congress and monopolized public thoughts and opinions. Now that the Obama Administration has made progress in that area with the support of Congressional Democrats, climate change has an opportunity to regain traction in American politcs.
The road is not an easy one. Major energy utilities and fossil fuel companies can be expected to lobby very hard to avoid any future climate change penalities and costs until the final possible moment. Also, while climate change is not nearly half as polarizing as the recent health care debate in Congress, the Democrats have spent a lot of their political bullets to get the health care legislation passed and there are many fences that will need to be mended -- both inside the party and with Republicans also -- in order to pass another major piece of legislation anytime soon.
It is encouraging that climate change has always had bi-partisan support from Congressional thought leaders such as John McCain, Joe Lieberman and John Kerry (among others). The climate change problem affects everyone equally, regardless of your politics -- nobody wants their grandkids to face severe global problems as a result of their inaction and squabbling. Certainly the European Union and Japanese economies are helping matters by being examples of environmental consciousness and stewardship through the Kyoto Protocol.
Here is a recent update from Bloomberg and BusinessWeek on the American effort to pass some form of climate change and cap and trade legislation this year. It seems from the article that there are some controversial offshore drilling elements to the draft bill must be resolved in the near term. Hopefully the Kerry-Lieberman efforts will equate into some tangible results in the not too distant future... in the meantime, I will continue to monitor this subject and provide updates as they occur. One can find the original article at http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-26/senators-outline-u-s-utility-carbon-market-for-climate-bill.html
Senators Outline U.S. Utility Carbon Market for Climate Bill
March 26, 2010, 12:02 AM EDT
By Simon Lomax and Kim Chipman
March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Senators Lindsey Graham and Joseph Lieberman outlined U.S. climate-change legislation that would have power companies buy and sell pollution rights in a carbon market and force oil companies to pay fixed fees for emissions.
While the bill is “a work in progress” and won’t be ready until next month, emissions from utilities will be regulated through a restricted trading system for pollution rights, Graham, a South Carolina Republican, told reporters after meeting with industry representatives in Washington yesterday.
“Nobody’s signed on, but I think we’ve got them engaged,” Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, said, referring to the meeting with industry groups that included the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Edison Electric Institute.
The outline marks the most Senators Graham, Lieberman and John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, have said about their months-long attempt to revamp stalled legislation that would curb carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse-gas emissions linked to climate change. The next step is to convince other lawmakers, including Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland who yesterday questioned whether there is a “critical mass” of support.
While negotiations with other senators are getting better, the trio is “not there yet,” Graham said.
The senators yesterday only described their ideas for the legislation and have yet to submit a written proposal.
Coastal Senators
Ten Senate Democrats including Cardin, Bill Nelson of Florida and Ron Wyden of Oregon said yesterday they won’t back climate-change legislation if it includes provisions that open U.S. coasts and oceans to “unfettered” oil-and-gas drilling.
“The votes of these 10 coastal senators are essential,” said Dan Weiss, director of climate strategy at the Washington- based Center for American Progress, a public policy group that advises Democrats. Weiss said there is “potential” for a compromise on the issue.
The coastal senators sent a letter to Graham, Lieberman and Kerry on March 23 and warned them of the potential for oil spills that would put coastal state economies and ecosystems in jeopardy. Graham and Lieberman didn’t say yesterday if drilling provisions are included in their proposal.
Legislation to establish a cap-and-trade program, in which power plants, oil refineries and factories would buy and sell emission rights, narrowly passed the House of Representatives in June. A similar plan, which was approved by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in November over a Republican boycott, failed to advance any further in Congress.
Under the new legislation, oil companies would pay a fixed fee for their emissions that is linked to the price that power companies pay for carbon dioxide allowances, Graham said. Some of the trading restrictions would include a maximum and minimum price for carbon dioxide allowances, or a “hard price collar,” Graham said.
While it’s not certain how the fee will be calculated, “it’s all related to the carbon market,” Lieberman said.
--Editors: Romaine Bostick, Steve Geimann.
Until recently, the climate subject has been relegated to secondary importance compared to the health care subject that has ensnared Congress and monopolized public thoughts and opinions. Now that the Obama Administration has made progress in that area with the support of Congressional Democrats, climate change has an opportunity to regain traction in American politcs.
The road is not an easy one. Major energy utilities and fossil fuel companies can be expected to lobby very hard to avoid any future climate change penalities and costs until the final possible moment. Also, while climate change is not nearly half as polarizing as the recent health care debate in Congress, the Democrats have spent a lot of their political bullets to get the health care legislation passed and there are many fences that will need to be mended -- both inside the party and with Republicans also -- in order to pass another major piece of legislation anytime soon.
It is encouraging that climate change has always had bi-partisan support from Congressional thought leaders such as John McCain, Joe Lieberman and John Kerry (among others). The climate change problem affects everyone equally, regardless of your politics -- nobody wants their grandkids to face severe global problems as a result of their inaction and squabbling. Certainly the European Union and Japanese economies are helping matters by being examples of environmental consciousness and stewardship through the Kyoto Protocol.
Here is a recent update from Bloomberg and BusinessWeek on the American effort to pass some form of climate change and cap and trade legislation this year. It seems from the article that there are some controversial offshore drilling elements to the draft bill must be resolved in the near term. Hopefully the Kerry-Lieberman efforts will equate into some tangible results in the not too distant future... in the meantime, I will continue to monitor this subject and provide updates as they occur. One can find the original article at http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-26/senators-outline-u-s-utility-carbon-market-for-climate-bill.html
Senators Outline U.S. Utility Carbon Market for Climate Bill
March 26, 2010, 12:02 AM EDT
By Simon Lomax and Kim Chipman
March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Senators Lindsey Graham and Joseph Lieberman outlined U.S. climate-change legislation that would have power companies buy and sell pollution rights in a carbon market and force oil companies to pay fixed fees for emissions.
While the bill is “a work in progress” and won’t be ready until next month, emissions from utilities will be regulated through a restricted trading system for pollution rights, Graham, a South Carolina Republican, told reporters after meeting with industry representatives in Washington yesterday.
“Nobody’s signed on, but I think we’ve got them engaged,” Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, said, referring to the meeting with industry groups that included the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Edison Electric Institute.
The outline marks the most Senators Graham, Lieberman and John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, have said about their months-long attempt to revamp stalled legislation that would curb carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse-gas emissions linked to climate change. The next step is to convince other lawmakers, including Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland who yesterday questioned whether there is a “critical mass” of support.
While negotiations with other senators are getting better, the trio is “not there yet,” Graham said.
The senators yesterday only described their ideas for the legislation and have yet to submit a written proposal.
Coastal Senators
Ten Senate Democrats including Cardin, Bill Nelson of Florida and Ron Wyden of Oregon said yesterday they won’t back climate-change legislation if it includes provisions that open U.S. coasts and oceans to “unfettered” oil-and-gas drilling.
“The votes of these 10 coastal senators are essential,” said Dan Weiss, director of climate strategy at the Washington- based Center for American Progress, a public policy group that advises Democrats. Weiss said there is “potential” for a compromise on the issue.
The coastal senators sent a letter to Graham, Lieberman and Kerry on March 23 and warned them of the potential for oil spills that would put coastal state economies and ecosystems in jeopardy. Graham and Lieberman didn’t say yesterday if drilling provisions are included in their proposal.
Legislation to establish a cap-and-trade program, in which power plants, oil refineries and factories would buy and sell emission rights, narrowly passed the House of Representatives in June. A similar plan, which was approved by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in November over a Republican boycott, failed to advance any further in Congress.
Under the new legislation, oil companies would pay a fixed fee for their emissions that is linked to the price that power companies pay for carbon dioxide allowances, Graham said. Some of the trading restrictions would include a maximum and minimum price for carbon dioxide allowances, or a “hard price collar,” Graham said.
While it’s not certain how the fee will be calculated, “it’s all related to the carbon market,” Lieberman said.
--Editors: Romaine Bostick, Steve Geimann.
Labels: Alternative Investments
america climate change,
carbon credits,
carbon market,
jon m queen,
jon mckee queen,
jon queen,
kerry lieberman climate,
us carbon cap,
us climate change
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



